Time to Reinstate Compulsory Military Service in America

I have received numerous e-mails about embattled Democrat Congressman Charlie Rangel's bill to reinstate compulsory military service in America. I would like everyone to look past who Charlie Rangel is, a crook who used his office for personal gain, and consider reinstating the draft based upon its merits.

I was in the Army when we made the transition from an military force based upon drafting able bodied men and women to serve, to an all volunteer force. I was against this move. However, politics and a knee jerk reaction by those who were against the Vietnam War led to the elimination of the draft. This was the wrong decision forced upon our military.

A calling to the nation's defense is the first responsibility of all American citizens since Bunker Hill.

Today, the military service hand picks those who will serve using criteria that set a high bar for entrance. That is good. The down side is many of our youth now consider service to the nation as secondary to their personal aggrandizement. Today's youth take advantage of the freedoms and liberties protected by our military. The American youth have no sense of service above ones' self. They have no skin in the game, so they play war games on their Wii and X-Boxes, when a real war is raging overseas and in the homeland. While our soldiers are fighting and dying in Iraq and Afghanistan, most Americans are going to the mall. Sad but true.

Here are the three reasons why I believe we must reinstate the draft and compulsory military service for all Americans:

1. America and the American dream are based upon sacrifice in service to the nation. Other countries understand that service above one's self interests creates a bond between the individual and the America whose bounty gives so much to so many from so few. Today less than one-percent of all Americans serve in our uniformed services. This one-percent is defending with their lives the other ninety-nine percent. That is not what being an American is all about. Service to protect and defend this nation is part and parcel of being an American citizen. Our military takes an oath to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Until you raise your right hand and so swear you will not understand what service really means. The military instills a sense of duty, honor and country in all who serve.
2. The military creates an understanding of team work, loyalty to ones comrades, and leadership. Few other organizations can make the same claim. Unlike the private sector, pledging one's life to be part of an elite group of military men and women transcends the ordinary world of work. However, leadership skill sets learn in the military easily transfer to the private sector and enhance the overall quality of our workforce and work place. Core values like showing up to work on time, dressing properly and addressing your superiors in a respectful manner are instilled during military training. While the American military has rules it also encourages independent decision making in the face of danger. Soldiers learn how to think on their feet. Something sorely lacking today.
3. Finally, the military provides training in a vast variety of careers. From driving a truck to flying billion dollar aircraft. From being a medic to commanding a hospital. Job expertise of our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines makes a difference in the workforce. The technical job skills learned as a baker, butcher, or candlestick maker carry over to our businesses with the added bonus of free on-the-job training provided by our military. A win-win for our society.

As Dan Senor, author of Startup Nation, points out it is Israel's compulsory military service that in large part has led to it being a startup nation. Everyone in Israel serves and has directly led to it being so successful and having so many entrepreneurs. As Dan points out it is the military experiences of Israeli youth that solidifies the idea that, " Israel is not just a country, but a comprehensive state of mind." That is what compulsory military service does, it creates a "comprehensive state of mind" that serves that nation well.

Time to reinstate compulsory military service in America and regain that which has been lost - our collective comprehensive state of mind.

To comment on this column please CLICK HERE.

Questions and Answers for New PTSD Rule (VA Office of Field Operations July 9, 2010)

I heard that VA has changed the regulations for PTSD claims. What has changed? VA has amended its rules for processing disability compensation claims for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The new rule eliminates the requirement for corroborating evidence of the claimed in-service stressor if it is related to the veteran’s “fear of hostile military or terrorist activity”.

What are the new requirements of this change? This new rule now requires that the following be demonstrated to establish service connection for PTSD: the claimed stressor is consistent with the places, types, and circumstances of the veteran’s service; A VA psychiatrist or psychologist, or contract equivalent, confirms that the claimed stressor is adequate to support a diagnosis of PTSD; and the veteran’s symptoms are related to the claimed stressor.

When does this new rule take effect? The new rule is effective on July 13, 2010. The rule is applicable to all PTSD service connected claims, including appeals, that are: pending before VA, or received on or after, July 13, 2010; pending before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals; or pending before VA on or after July 13, 2010, because the Veterans Court vacated and remanded a Board decision.

I claimed PTSD before and was denied. If I reopen now, will VA go back to when I first claimed PTSD? If service connection for PTSD is granted under the amended regulation, the effective date will be no earlier than July 13, 2010, the date the new rule went into effect.

I currently have a PTSD claim (or appeal) for service connection pending at the regional office and am waiting for a decision. What do I have to do? Nothing. This new rule will be applied to any pending claim (or appeal) involving service connection for PTSD.

Should I still provide proof of my combat medals? You should always submit any evidence that would support your claim.

I claimed PTSD. Will I be scheduled for a VA exam? Your claim will be reviewed and, if a VA exam is necessary, you will receive a separate notification letter with reporting instructions.

My private physician has already diagnosed me with PTSD. Do I have to report for a VA exam? A private report or diagnosis is not adequate for establishing service connection for PTSD; therefore, a VA exam will be required. You should submit this supporting evidence from your doctor, or we can request those for you. (PCR must offer VA Form 21-4142 and document evidence on VA Form 21-0820. Refer VA Form 21-0820 to SOJ.)

I have been denied service connection for PTSD in the past. How do I reapply? We will have to reopen your claim. (PCR must take claim on VA Form 21-0820 and refer to SOJ.)

Does this change regarding PTSD apply to any Veteran? Yes. This change applies to all veterans, regardless of when they served.

VA Simplifies Access to Health Care and Benefits for Veterans with PTSD (VA News Release July 12, 2010) WASHINGTON – Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric K. Shinseki announced a critical step forward in providing an easier process for veterans seeking health care and disability compensation for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), with the publication of a final regulation in the Federal Register.

By publishing a final regulation in the Federal Register to simplify the process for a veteran to claim service connection for PTSD, VA reduces the evidence needed if the trauma claimed by a veteran is related to fear of hostile military or terrorist activity and is consistent with the places, types, and circumstances of the veteran’s service. This science-based regulation relies on evidence that concluded that a veteran’s deployment to a war zone is linked to an increased risk of PTSD.

Under the new rule, VA would not require corroboration of a stressor related to fear of hostile military or terrorist activity if a VA doctor confirms that the stressful experience recalled by a veteran adequately supports a diagnosis of PTSD and the veteran's symptoms are related to the claimed stressor. Previously, claims adjudicators were required to corroborate that a non-combat veteran actually experienced a stressor related to hostile military activity. This final rule simplifies the development that is required for these cases.

VA expects this rule making to decrease the time it takes VA to decide access to care and claims falling under the revised criteria. More than 400,000 veterans currently receiving compensation benefits are service connected for PTSD. Combined with VA’s shorter claims form, VA’s new streamlined, science-based regulation allows for faster and more accurate decisions that also expedite access to medical care and other benefits for veterans.

PTSD is a medically recognized anxiety disorder that can develop from seeing or experiencing an event that involves actual or threatened death or serious injury to which a person responds with intense fear, helplessness or horror, and is not uncommon among war veterans.

For additional information, go to www.va.gov or call VA’s toll free benefits number at 1-800-827-1000.

Charlotte County Veterans Council Donates Computer

The Charlotte County Veterans Council will present a dedicated computer to the Military Heritage Museum on behalf of Don Moore, a longtime military affairs writer, Saturday, June 26 at 1 p.m., during the “Village and Verse: Taste of the Village” literary/culinary festival at Fishermen’s Village.

Terry Lynn, President of the Veterans Council, said the computer will enable veterans and visitors to the museum to read a growing cyber-collection of “War Tales,” the popular column about military men and women written by Moore which appears weekly in the Charlotte Sun.

“Freedom’s not free,” Lynn said. “Giving people access to these tales of military men and women is a way of reminding us of the sacrifices people made for this country.”

Lynn praised Kim Lovejoy, Executive Director of the Museum, for her vision.

“Kim understands technology, and the importance of blending the displays and artifacts at the museum with the latest computer advances,” Lynn said. “That means we’re sure she’ll find a way to combine our gift with existing displays to present a dynamic picture of our veterans.

Moore, who is working to archive the thousands of “War Tales” he has collected, was surprised but pleased to hear of the gift.

“I’m just doing my job in telling these stories, but I’d love to find a way to get them all available for research or whatever,” he said.

Moore, who has published two volumes of his “War Tales” columns, will be available to autograph copies of his books. The ceremony will take place at the Military Heritage Museum, located just inside Fishermen’s Village.

All veterans and the general public are invited to attend the ceremony.

Don't Ask About Homosexuality, Don't Tell About Its Negative Impacts On Our Military

President Obama, Senator Levin and Speaker Pelosi are forcing a vote on the repeal of the Don't Ask, Don't Tell legislation that has served us well. They are doing so without the benefit of a report from the Department of Defense (DOD) on the impact of repealing this law on our readiness and sustainability of the all volunteer force.

But why?

It is because when the DOD studies an issue they really study it. Their report will have great credibility and a major impact on how homosexuality is viewed, not only in our military, but in our society. If the DOD report shows that having homosexuals in the military negatively impacts our combat readiness, the health, morale and welfare of our forces, and presents long term risks to the sustainability of the force, then the barriers to looking at homosexuals in our society will be broken down. President Obama, Senator Levin and Speaker Pelosi cannot let that report get out to the public because support for repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell will collapse.

People will begin to say well if homosexual behavior negatively impacts our military does it not also negatively impact our society?

The federal government has not seriously studied the long term impacts of homosexual behavior on the individual, their partners and society as a whole. This DOD report could open the way for further studies by other government agencies like Health and Human Services on homosexuality. Researchers would feel emboldened to study the impacts of homosexuality on our healthcare system, businesses and social policy. It will open a Pandora's box that President Obama wants to keep the lid on.

I have written about the negative health aspects of homosexuality here, and here. It is critical that the DOD report be completed and released to Congress and the American people before any legislation repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell is considered.

Here is a video from FRC Action on what our generals think about repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell:

Related articles:

Veterans Groups and House Armed Services Leaders Oppose President’s DADT Plan

Rush to Repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell an Insult to Military Personnel and Their Families

What has Allah ever done for you? | Red County

What has Allah ever done for you? | Red County

Legislative Update - July 2009 by LTC Lee F. Kichen

BATTLING INSIDE THE BELTWAY: Federal Legislative Update

VFW State Commander Tells Congress to Leave VA Health Care and TRICARE Alone-In a letter to the Florida delegation of the United States Congress, Department Commander Stephen Surface urged the Senators and members of the House of Representatives leave VA health care and TRICARE out of a national health care reform package. Surface wrote: “Military health benefits provide an essential offset to the extraordinary demands and sacrifices inherent in a military career. Unique and specialized VA programs acknowledge special government responsibilities to those who incur service-caused injuries and illnesses. Each is critical in sustaining a career all-volunteer force, and subjecting them to taxation would be a major erosion of benefits that would undermine recruiting, retention, and national security.” We believe that VA health care should continue as stand alone and untaxed programs rather than be absorbed by some ill-defined national health care system. To do so would fail to recognize the government’s special responsibility to the active, reserve and retired military members and veterans and their families.

Advanced Funding for VA Health Care Continues to Make Progress-Advanced funding for the Veterans Affairs Department moved a big step forward, when the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans Affairs (MILCON/VA) while considering the 2010 appropriation agreed to set aside $48 billion for 2011 veterans’ health care costs.

This action represents the latest step towards achieving the VFW number one legislative priority of ensuring predictable and continuous funding for veterans’ health care. Only once in the last nineteen years has The Congress completed this all important appropriation on time. Before advanced funding becomes a reality, lawmakers must work-out final details like how much money needs to be set aside to cover a budget one year in advance including cost estimates and a procedure for making adjustments if the estimates are wrong.

In other action, the MILCON/VA subcommittee, chaired by Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., approved a $133.8 billion funding bill on Monday, including $23 billion for military construction, $53 billion for veterans’ health care and administrative programs and $55.8 billion in mandatory spending, such as veterans’ benefits. The 2010 spending is about $440 million more than the Obama administration had requested.

“We have done our best to address both the needs of the military and our veterans in this legislation,” Johnson said in a statement. “I remain committed to keeping our promises to our veterans and honoring them by ensuring they receive the care they deserve and require.”

Advanced funding includes $37.1 billion for medical services, $5.7 billion for medical facilities and $5.3 billion for medical support, money that would become available on Oct. 1, 2010, which is the first day of fiscal 2011.

The House version of the 2010 veterans funding bill includes a placeholder for a 2011 advanced appropriation but does not provide a specific number while waiting on the Obama administration to make 2011 budget estimates.

House Adopts “Light” Concurrent Receipt Measure-When the House Armed Services Committee did its “mark-up” of the FY 2010 National Defense Authorization Act we were very disappointed to learn that it did not include the Obama’ Administration’s proposal to expand Concurrent Receipt of Military Retirement Pay and VA Disability Compensation to disabled military retirees with less than 20 years of service.

However, after considering through nearly 70 amendments, the House voted overwhelmingly (389-to-22) on June 25 to approve its version of the FY 2010 Defense Authorization Bill (HR 2647). With respect to Concurrent Receipt there is “good news” and “bad news”. One of the most important floor amendments was offered by Committee Chairman Ike Skelton (D-MO), to phase out over five years the disability offset to military retired pay for service members retired for disability (Chapter 61).

The first three years of the five-year phase-out would end the offset for more severely disabled Chapter 61 retirees with less than 20 years of service:

• On January 1, 2010, Chapter 61 retirees with less than 20 years of service and a VA rating of either 90% or 100%, or who are deemed “unemployable” by the VA, would become eligible.
• On January 1, 2011, Chapter 61 retirees with less than 20 years of service and a VA rating of either 70% or 80% become eligible.
• On January 1, 2012, Chapter 61 retirees with less than 20 years of service and a VA rating of either 50% or 60% become eligible.

Over the following two years, the offset would be eliminated for all remaining Chapter 61 retirees:

• On January 1, 2013, Chapter 61 retirees with a VA rating of either 30% or 40% will become eligible.
• On January 1, 2014, Chapter 61 retirees with any VA rating become eligible.

The bad news is that House leaders were able to identify funding only for the first increment in 2010. Congress would have to come up with additional funding by Oct 1, 2010, or the program would expire. In reality there is little chance of Congress letting this high-profile initiative (which was generated by President Obama) lapse.

Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC), the senior Republican on the House Armed Services Military Personnel Subcommittee, expressed his support of the bill but said the House “could have done so much more.” We couldn’t agree more with Mr. Wilson.

TALLAHASSEE TALES: State Legislative Update

Veterans of Foreign Wars Adopts State Legislative Priorities for 2010-The 2009-10 Department Council of Administration met for the first time immediately after this year’s convention in Orlando on June 21 and adopted, on a voice vote, the following legislative priorities:

1. Legislation asking the people to amend Article VII, Section 6 (e) of the Florida Constitution eliminating the pre-service Florida residency requirements for the “Combat Related” ad Valorem tax exemption. Last year, the COA adopted similar language as well as language seeking an Ad Valorem exemption for members of the Armed Forces receiving hostile fire or being in imminent danger. The 2009 Regular Session of the Florida Legislature adopted a resolution amending the Florida Constitution allowing an Ad Valorem exemption to all service members deployed overseas. This resolution will require approval by 60% of the voters in the November 2010 General Election. Senator David Aronberg (D-West Palm Beach) and Representative Doug Holder (R-FL)

2. Legislation authorizing charitable organizations to utilize electronic or other mechanical devices to dispense “Instant Bingo” cards. During the Regular Session of the 2009 Florida Legislature, we secured language authorizing machines in the Senate version of a gambling bill. However, the House did not have language authorizing the use of machines. We expect Senator Mike Fasano (R-New Port Richey) to once again sponsor this bill in the upper chamber, we should work the House leadership to gain support for this measure.

3. Legislation providing for the sale of a Veterans of Foreign Wars distinctive license plate with the proceeds of sales accruing to the Department of Florida VFW Foundation. House Transportation Committee Chairman, Representative Rich Glorioso, late last session invited the VFW to submit language for his review. Attached hereto is a copy of that language.

4. Legislation granting Congressionally Chartered veterans service organizations an exemption from the Department of Agriculture administrative solicitation fees. Last session we were unable to gain any support for this legislation given the fact the Legislature looked at raising most state fees as a means of raising revenue.

5. Legislation granting equal treatment for wartime veterans in the state retirement system. Senator Aronberg intends to reintroduce this legislation in 2010. A potential House sponsor is Representative Maria Lorts-Sach (D-Delray Beach). Ms. Sachs was the driving force behind the VFW Legislative Priority expanding veteran’s preferences for State and Local jobs.

Recommended County, Municipal and School District Legislative Priority

Local ordinances establishing preferences for disabled veteran owned businesses bidding on county, municipal and school district contracts.

Vets Funding Passed!

Today, the House of Representatives passed legislation that provides guaranteed funding for health care programs within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The House approved a bill (H.R. 1016) by a 409-1 vote. H.R. 1016 would provide for two-year advance funding for certain Department of Veteran Affairs health care programs, prosthetics and Internet technologies. As a cosponsor of H.R. 1016, and a member of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, I am very pleased that the House took action to help protect the funding of important VA health care programs.

In addition, the House also passed a few other bills related to veterans. I have summarized those bills below:

• H.R. 1211 would require the VA to study the barriers and services for women veterans; it would provide staff training to better treat sexual trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); it would establish a child care pilot program for certain veterans receiving care; and it would allow the VA to provide care for a newborn of a woman veteran receiving VA maternity care. The House passed this bill with a 408-0 vote.

• H.R. 1172 would allow the VA to post a list of organizations that provide scholarships to veterans and their survivors on its website. The House passed this bill with a 411-0 vote.

• S. 407 amends the rates of compensation for veterans with service-connected disabilities and the rates of dependency and indemnity compensation for the survivors of certain disabled veterans and will codify increases equal to that of the cost of living adjustment of Social Security, and make it retroactive to December 1, 2008. The House passed this bill with a 403-0 vote.

I hope that this legislative update is helpful. Please do not hesitate to contact either my Sarasota Office (941-951-6643) or my Bradenton Office (941-747-9081) on a veterans issue or with any other concern that you have.

Sincerely,

Vern Buchanan
Member of Congress

Legislative Update - June 2009 by LTC Lee F. Kichen

Federal Legislative Update:

Bill to Ease PTSD Burden of Proof Goes to Committee-A bill designed to make it easier for veterans to receive benefits and immediate care for post-traumatic stress disorder moved to the House Veterans Affairs Committee on Wednesday and is expected to be voted on by the committee this month. This bill if it becomes law will, in essence, relax the requirement to prove a “combat stressor”. H.R. 952 would clarify that “combat with the enemy” is defined as duty in a combat theater during a time of war or against a “hostile force during a period of hostilities” for those seeking service-connected benefits for disabilities. According to the bill’s sponsor Rep. John Hall, D-N.Y, it “essentially establishes service in combat as a presumptive stressor for the incurrence of PTSD. No longer should veterans have to leap high hurdles and battle with VA in order to receive urgently needed benefits”. If a veteran did not possess an award for valor or Purple Heart or badge denoting combat such as a Combat Infantryman Badge or Combat Action a veteran can substantiate a stressful event by witness letters from commanders or fellow service members to verify that they had been exposed to a traumatic event. In some cases, those people were difficult to find; some had died. In other cases, the veterans gave up because asking for the letters forced them to relive experiences they were not ready to talk about. Those not in infantry or other combat-related positions — including all women — also have had a difficult time proving combat status.

Bill Introduced Granting Benefits to Certain World War II Groups-HR 2270 would extend $1,000-a-month benefits to several World War II groups not covered by the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944, commonly known as the World War II GI Bill of Rights, but, who were provided veteran status under the GI Bill Improvement Act of 1977 — was forwarded to the House Veterans Affairs Committee. That bill was introduced by Rep. Steve Buyer, R-Ind., and came in response to HR 23, which provided monthly payments to Merchant Marines who served during World War II. Buyer said veterans such as the Flying Tigers — only 18 of whom are still alive — and the United States Cadets Nurses Corps should also receive benefits.

House Committee Marks up Vet Bills: Several other VFW-supported bills cleared their respective subcommittees this week. All of the bills now move to the full committee for consideration.

HR 1037 would authorize $10 million annually to implement a five-year pilot program to expand work-study activities for veterans on campuses.

HR 1098, The Veterans' Worker Retraining Act of 2009 would increase educational assistance for veterans pursuing internships or on-the-job training. It also increased the monthly training assistance for eligible veterans and their dependents under the Survivors and Dependents Educational Assistance program.

HR 2180 would waive housing loan fees for veterans with service-connected disabilities called to active duty.

HR 1821, The Equity for Injured Veterans Act of 2009 would extend VA's Vocational Rehabilitation program to 15 years following discharge or release from active duty. It also authorizes single parents participating in the program up to $2000 a month for child care services.

Benefits Bill for Women Veterans Cleared: A comprehensive bill that will improve health care for female veterans cleared the House Veterans' Affairs Subcommittee on Health this week. HR 1211, The Women Veterans Health Care Improvement Act is a VFW priority goal. The bill as passed would:

· Authorize $4 million to VA to study barriers women face in accessing care and another $5 million for an assessment of the VA's health care services and programs provided to female veterans.

· Create a new program to offer graduate medical education, training and certification to mental health professionals who provide counseling, care and services for veterans suffering from sexual trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder.

· Authorize $1.5 million in 2010 and 2011 for a pilot program to provide child care to veterans who are receiving mental health or other intensive care services at VA facilities.

· Provide health care services for the newborns of female veterans, who delivered at VA facilities, for 7 days after birth.

Last month, the Senate VA Committee passed similar legislation in a large health care bill. VFW thanks both Senator Patty Murray and Representative Herseth-Sandlin for their leadership on this most important bill.

No COLA for 2010-Military retirees, disabled veterans and others receiving inflation-adjusted federal benefits should not expect to see any increase this year, according to a new Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate. According CBO projections Social Security recipients will not receive a COLA. Since military retired pay, VA disability compensation and survivors’ benefits are linked to Social Security there is little possibility of an increase this coming year.

Social Security, military and federal civilian retirement and some other federal benefits automatically increase each Dec. 1 based on the Consumer Price Index, a measurement of the cost of goods and services maintained by the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics. Largely due to falling energy and transportation expenses, the CPI shows consumer prices are lower today than one year ago. The May 15 report shows costs today are 0.7 percent lower now than one year ago. Continuing drop in CPI will not result in any reduction in benefits as there is no provision under the law that would trigger a reduction in benefits if the CPI falls below the previous year.

Administration Proposes Widening Eligibility for Concurrent Retirement and Disability Pay (CRDP) -In an earlier article we indicated that we would possibly see some liberalization of the eligibility criteria for CRDP. This past month we saw the Obama White House proposal to expand concurrent receipt to service members who were medically retired, sometimes referred to as Chapter 61 retirees.
Under the Administration’s proposed Defense budget, all Chapter 61 retirees will become eligible for Concurrent Retirement and Disability Pay (CRDP) over a five-year period starting in January 2010. The expansion will come in two phases.

The first three years of the five year phase-in opens CRDP eligibility to the more severely disabled Chapter 61 retirees with less than 20 years of service.

• On January 1, 2010, Chapter 61 retirees with less than 20 years of service and a VA rating of either 90% or 100% become eligible.
• On January 1, 2011, Chapter 61 retirees with less than 20 years of service and a VA rating of either 70% or 80% become eligible.
• On January 1, 2012, Chapter 61 retirees with less than 20 years of service and a VA rating of either 50% or 60% become eligible.

The remaining two years of this phase-in extends CRDP to Chapter 61 retirees, regardless of years of service, with a VA rating of less than 50%.

• On January 1, 2013, all Chapter 61 retirees with a VA rating of either 30% or 40% will become eligible.
• On January 1, 2014, all Chapter 61 retirees with any VA rating become eligible.

Unfortunately some disabled retirees will still be left out of the “concurrent receipt calculus” Once this plan is completed, the only disabled retirees ineligible for CRDP will be non-medical retirees with 40% or lower VA disability ratings. The 10-year cost of the expansion is estimated to be $5.8 billion.

While this new initiative represents a 180-degree turnabout from the positions of all previous Administrations, Republican or Democrat, it still is not “full and immediate concurrent receipt of military retired and VA disability compensation” which has been our long standing goal. Regardless of the time served whether it was twenty years or some period less the economic and quality of life impact of a disabling condition is the same. If the Administration doesn’t want to go “the final mile”, maybe our friends in The Congress can drag them over the finish line and provide concurrent receipt for all disabled retirees.

TALLAHASSEE TALES: State Legislative Update

Proposed Constitutional Amendment Goes to the 2010 Ballot-The Department of Florida, Veterans of Foreign Wars at the conclusion of 2008 adopted two legislative priorities calling for legislation which would grant an Ad Valorem tax exemption for active personnel serving in combat operations. Additionally, we called on the legislature to expand eligibility for the “combat related” Ad Valorem tax discount. The Florida Legislature heard us. At the conclusion of the session, the Legislature adopted the resolution which places on the ballot an amendment to the Florida Constitution to provide an additional property tax exemption for members of the United States military or its reserves, the United States Coast Guard or its reserves, or the Florida National Guard who receive a homestead exemption and were deployed in the previous year on active duty outside the continental United States, Alaska, or Hawaii in support of military operations. Although our original proposal was limited to veterans serving in combat operations we applaud the sponsors and cosponsors for doing the right thing. Our number one mission in 2010 is to get the voters to approve this amendment. State Senator Dave Aronberg (D-27) and State Representative Doug Holder assured us that they will lead the effort to pass a resolution broadening eligibility for the “combat related” Ad Valorem discount to veterans with combat related disabilities who are now homesteaded in Florida and entered the Armed Forces from other states.

Instant Bingo Machine Bill Killed in the House-Just when we thought we were going to get legislation authorizing instant bingo machines, the House of Representatives backed away from the Senate bill. Our friends in the Florida Senate have pledged to introduce a bill in 2010; our job will be to get the House to agree to a Senate bill.

Governor Crist Signs Legislation Favorable to the Military and Veterans Communities

Senate Bill 316, High School Diplomas/Vietnam War Veterans – This legislation recognizes the enormous commitment and sacrifice veterans of the Vietnam War made to serve their country during war time. This bill, sponsored by Senator Lee Constantine, authorizes the Commissioner of Education to award Vietnam veterans who were honorably discharged with a Florida high school diploma. This bill is similar to existing legislation that awards diplomas to veterans of World War II and the Korean War.

House Bill 509 State Veterans Benefits– Sponsored by Representative Juan Zapata and Senator Mike Fasano, this legislation will improve the lives of Florida’s veterans and their families for generations to come by accomplishing several important goals:

· Waives building and permitting fees for safety and accessibility residential renovations for Florida’s 20,000 veterans permanently and totally disabled as a result of their military service.

· Removes the cap on certain military and veteran license tag fees to help fund Florida’s Veterans Nursing Home Trust Fund.

· Incorporates Title 33 of the United States Code into Florida law, allowing the implementation of the New GI Bill, or Post 9/11 GI Bill, which goes into effect August 1, 2009.

House Bill 685, Educational Dollars for Duty Program – This bill, sponsored by Representative Bill Proctor and Senator Mike Fasano, makes significant improvements to the Florida National Guard’s Education Dollars for Duty Program (EDD). The following changes to Florida law have been made to increase the program’s effectiveness and to increase its usefulness as a recruitment and retention tool:

· Expands eligibility to guard members seeking a master’s degree, to those with more than 15 years service, and to those who have not completed basic military training.

· Extends the program to include Florida’s accredited nonpublic postsecondary education institutions and vocational-technical programs.

· Clarifies that the EDD program is available for active members and requires members to complete their enlistment or reenlistment contract, instead of serving only three years after the exemption is granted.

· Authorizes the program to include college-preparatory courses.

The legislation also ensures fairness and equitability to the members of the Air National Guard.

House Bill 635, Military Affairs – This legislation adds significant legal protections for Florida National Guard soldiers and airmen on active duty while they are serving the State of Florida. Sponsored by Representative Michael Scionti and Senator Charlie Justice, this bill enhances re-employment rights and adds protective measures against discrimination of military members by employers. It also creates a civil penalty of up to $1,000 per violation.

Under Pressure from the Major Veterans Service Organizations, President Obama Withdraws Plan to Charge Private Insurance for Treatment by VA

I have been writing this newsletter for over ten years on a monthly basis. As a result of my trip last week to Washington, DC, it is appropriate that I write a special edition which is really a follow-up to my earlier piece criticizing President Obama’s proposal to seek third party payment from private insurance veterans receiving treatment from VA for the service connected conditions.

This issue came to a boil last Monday, when the leaders of the major veterans’ service organizations met with President Obama and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. Our leadership made it very clear that this proposal was a non-starter. Going into that meeting, the VFW’s position was clear. Previously, Commander in Chief Glen Gardner stated that "It is unconscionable to pass along the costs of war to wounded and disabled veterans. This is one policy proposal that the VFW will work hard to defeat because it breaks a sacred trust that veterans have with their government.

A joint letter from the major veterans’ service organizations unambiguously staked out our position by stating:"This proposal ignores the solemn obligation that this country has to care for those men and women who have served this country with distinction and were left with the wounds and scars of that service. The blood spilled in service to this nation is the premium that service-connected veterans have paid for their earned care.” This same letter asked for a meeting with the President, VA Secretary Eric K. Shinseki and Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orzag.

By the time of the Monday meeting, this issue was getting some play in the main stream media and the White House was not looking for any adverse publicity. At the conclusion of the Monday meeting, the President stated that the Administration wouldn’t go through with its proposal if the organizations remained opposed. Surprisingly, it took more than forty-eight hours and a major lobbying effort on Capitol Hill before the White House withdrew the proposal. On Wednesday, March 18, 2009 Commander in Chief, Glen Gardner presented the VFW’s legislative priorities to a Joint Hearing of the Senate and House Veterans Affairs Committee. Gardner opened his remarks by stating the White House’s “…proposal would lead to disabled veterans subsidizing their own injuries through increased premiums and fees as insurance companies try to find ways to pass along the added expense," testified Gardner, a Vietnam veteran from Round Rock, Texas.

"It could also make it harder for veterans to obtain and maintain private health care insurance, and it is entirely possible that this proposal could impair a veteran’s ability to obtain a job." This issue clearly resonated with the members of the Veterans Affairs committees, the Chairmen, Senator Daniel Akaka (D-HI) and Representative Robert Filner (D-CA) and the Ranking Members Senator Richard (R-SC) and Representative Steve Buyer (R-IN) made it clear that this proposal had no support in The Congress. Chairman Akaka stated the Obama plan was “dead on arrival”, while Chairman Filner remarked, this committee “…will not authorize such a plan…”

This was clearly a lesson in Civics 101 for the Obama Administration. America’s veterans when working together represent an incredibly strong interest group. Additionally, the President can only propose, it is The Congress that disposes. What is troubling is that the Administration’s bean counters have little respect for America’s veterans by believing that veteran’s would willingly assume the burden of paying for a disability resulting from selfless service to this country. Lastly, where was VA Secretary Shinseki? Did he or did he not raise a caution flag on this proposal? Will the man described as soldier’s soldier, really be a veteran’s veteran?

Echoing the concerns of many veterans, Mr. Gardner asked if veterans can trust VA after the revelation that 16,000 pieces of mail were shred at one Regional Office. The Commander in Chief also addressed the need for advanced funding of the VA, further traumatic brain injury research and treatment, suicide awareness and prevention, women veterans' healthcare needs, seamless transition, new GI Bill implementation, vocational rehabilitation program enhancements, military Tricare, homeless veterans and survivor benefits, among others. For a complete copy of the testimony go to http://www.vfw.org/PR/Legislative/H&STestimony3.18.pdf.

The American Legion Strongly Opposed to President's Plan to Charge Wounded Heroes for Treatment

WASHINGTON, March 16 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The leader of the nation's largest veterans organization says he is "deeply disappointed and concerned" after a meeting with President Obama today to discuss a proposal to force private insurance companies to pay for the treatment of military veterans who have suffered service-connected disabilities and injuries. The Obama administration recently revealed a plan to require private insurance carriers to reimburse the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in such cases.

"It became apparent during our discussion today that the President intends to move forward with this unreasonable plan," said Commander David K. Rehbein of The American Legion. "He says he is looking to generate $540-million by this method, but refused to hear arguments about the moral and government-avowed obligations that would be compromised by it."

The Commander, clearly angered as he emerged from the session said, "This reimbursement plan would be inconsistent with the mandate ' to care for him who shall have borne the battle' given that the United States government sent members of the armed forces into harm's way, and not private insurance companies. I say again that The American Legion does not and will not support any plan that seeks to bill a veteran for treatment of a service connected disability at the very agency that was created to treat the unique need of America's veterans!"

Commander Rehbein was among a group of senior officials from veterans service organizations joining the President, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel, Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki and Steven Kosiak, the overseer of defense spending at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The group's early afternoon conversation at The White House was precipitated by a letter of protest presented to the President earlier this month. The letter, co-signed by Commander Rehbein and the heads of ten colleague organizations, read, in part, " There is simply no logical explanation for billing a veteran's personal insurance for care that the VA has a responsibility to provide. While we understand the fiscal difficulties this country faces right now, placing the burden of those fiscal problems on the men and women who have already sacrificed a great deal for this country is unconscionable."

Commander Rehbein reiterated points made last week in testimony to both House and Senate Veterans' Affairs Committees. It was stated then that The American Legion believes that the reimbursement plan would be inconsistent with the mandate that VA treat service-connected injuries and disabilities given that the United States government sends members of the armed forces into harm's way, and not private insurance companies. The proposed requirement for these companies to reimburse the VA would not only be unfair, says the Legion, but would have an adverse impact on service-connected disabled veterans and their families. The Legion argues that, depending on the severity of the medical conditions involved, maximum insurance coverage limits could be reached through treatment of the veteran's condition alone. That would leave the rest of the family without health care benefits. The Legion also points out that many health insurance companies require deductibles to be paid before any benefits are covered. Additionally, the Legion is concerned that private insurance premiums would be elevated to cover service-connected disabled veterans and their families, especially if the veterans are self-employed or employed in small businesses unable to negotiate more favorable across-the-board insurance policy pricing. The American Legion also believes that some employers, especially small businesses, would be reluctant to hire veterans with service-connected disabilities due to the negative impact their employment might have on obtaining and financing company health care benefits.

"I got the distinct impression that the only hope of this plan not being enacted," said Commander Rehbein, "is for an alternative plan to be developed that would generate the desired $540-million in revenue. The American Legion has long advocated for Medicare reimbursement to VA for the treatment of veterans. This, we believe, would more easily meet the President's financial goal. We will present that idea in an anticipated conference call with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel in the near future.

"I only hope the administration will really listen to us then. This matter has far more serious ramifications than the President is imagining," concluded the Commander.

SOURCE The American Legion

South West Florida Blue Star Mothers

The first meeting of the new South West Florida Blue Star Mothers is this Saturday - March 14th, 2009 from 2:00-4:00 p.m. Please join us at this historic meeting!!

This month we will sign our Charter and by becoming a Member this Saturday, you will have the opportunity to be a Charter Member!

The meeting place is located at:

Sarasota County Fire Station, Arlington Park,
2070 Waldemere, Sarasota, FL, 34237

Meeting from 2:00-4:00 p.m. with refreshments

Here is the link to the National Association: http://www.bluestarmothers.org/

We are currently preparing to work on our own website and look forward it's launch once our chapter is Chartered.We gather here to serve and support our local families of active military solders and veterans!

Lets stay in touch and don't hesitate to call me or Deb Marquis anytime.

Deb Marquis, pending President 941-379-3619

Susan Chandler, pending V.P. 941-812-1551

Your with caring support,

Susan Chandler

Veterans Legislative Update - March 2009

Federal Legislative Update

Is President Obama’s Proposed Budget Good News or Bad News Veterans?

The Administration last week unveiled a preview of its budget for Fiscal Year 2010. The good news is that the Obama Administration is calling for a twenty-five million dollar increase in appropriations for the VA for the next five years. This outlay assumes enrolling approximately one half million non-disabled veterans in the VA health care system. However, the bad news is that disabled veterans will be the bill payers for this largesse. The FY 2010 budget request for VA includes a proposal that would bill veterans with private insurance for their service-connected disability treatments. The budget calls for about a $1 billion dollar increase in collections from FY 2009. We believe that the revenue projections for the proposal make up the bulk of the third-party collections increase. The Veterans of Foreign Wars vehemently opposes any attempt to pass healthcare costs on to wounded and service-connected disabled veterans. Billing a veteran's private insurance could lead to higher premiums and make it difficult for veterans and their families to obtain or retain their health insurance, as well as discourage employers from hiring disabled vets.

The VFW is asking all members as well as all Americans to contact their congressional delegations and urge them to stop this proposal from becoming a reality. This is a classic case of double speak, President Obama is calling for a national health care system which contains costs for families. Health care for disabled veterans is not a gift it was earned by their very blood, pain and suffering. We find it absolutely unconscionable that disabled veterans should bare the costs of care for non-disabled veterans. To send a message to Senator Nelson, Martinez or your member in the House of Representatives to: http://capwiz.com/vfw/issues/alert/?alertid=12844211. To read the VFW Press Release, go to: http://www.vfw.org/index.cfm?fa=news.newsDtl&did=4952.

President’s Budget Calls for Expanded Concurrent Receipt of Military Retired Pay and VA Disability Compensation-It has been a long standing goal of the VFW and the veterans' service organizations and military associations to gain full and immediate concurrent receipt. At the end of the Clinton Administration we gained some small relief under the Special Compensation for Severely Disabled Military Retirees. We made significant progress during the Bush Administration when The Congress authorized Combat Related Special Compensation and then Concurrent Disability Pay.

While these benefits were quite generous, not all disabled military retirees are eligible for concurrent receipt. Left out of the mix are those whose non-combat related disabled retirees with VA disability evaluations between 10% and 40%. For the first time in the more than twenty years we have been fighting for concurrent receipt, a President actually addressed this issue in his budget submission to The Congress. According to President Obama’s budget release, it would expand coverage to currently ineligible medically retired members who are highly disabled. No specifics are available yet, but that could mean authorizing concurrent receipt for medical retirees with less than 20 years and at least a 50% VA rating. We’ll need the details to be sure, but any expansion is encouraging news for the disabled retiree community. Having learned a long time ago, there is no free lunch, there will be a bill payer. More likely than not, the bill payer will be the reduction or curtailment of some weapon system.

Senator Bill Nelson Introduces Legislation to End Dependency and Indemnity Compensation offset to Survivors’ Benefits Payments-Senator Nelson (D-FL) introduced his bipartisan bill, “The Military Retiree Survivor Equity Act” (S. 535), which would repeal the law that requires deduction of VA survivor benefits from military Survivor Benefit Plan annuities. The reduction can be up to $1,154 per month and affects 57,000 survivors. Please also urge your U.S. representatives to cosponsor the House companion bill H.R. 775 sponsored by Reps. Solomon Ortiz (D-TX) and Henry Brown (R-SC).

Floridian Members of United States Congress are Slow to Support Bills dealing with TRICARE and VA Health Care-We have been urging the Florida delegation in the United States House of Representatives to cosponsor H.R. 816 “Military Retirees Health Care Protection Act” which prohibits the Department of Defense from increasing TRICARE enrollment fees and co-payments. We are gratified that Representative C. W. “Bill” Young (R-FL10) and Representative Suzanne Kosmas (D-FL24) have joined in this bipartisan effort, however, we are extremely disappointed that the names of the other twenty-three members of Florida’s delegation are conspicuously absent from this bill. The VFW’s number legislative priority this year is H.R. 1016 “Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and Transparency Act of 2009”. If H.R. 1016 becomes law it basically establishes a two year funding stream for VA’s health care accounts thus providing VA health care a sufficient, predictable and timely appropriation to meet the needs of America’s disabled and sick veterans. We are pleased that the following Floridians are cosponsoring this bill: Representative Vern Buchanan (R-FL13), Representative Robert Wexler (D-FL19) and Representative Suzanne Kosmas (D-FL24). If your representative is not one of the above three, please contact them and tell them to support Florida’s veterans by co-sponsoring H.R. 1016.

TALLAHASSEE TALES

State Legislative Update

VFW’s Number State Legislative Priority Gains Support-At last year’s State Convention, the Council of Administration called for legislation which would grant an Ad Valorem tax exemption for active personnel serving in combat operations. Additionally, we called on the legislature to expand eligibility for the “combat related” Ad Valorem tax exemption. Since the last “At Your Service”, we have gained significant support for these priorities. Senators Dave Aronberg (D-27) and Mike Fasano (R-11) have introduced Senate Joint Resolution 1550 and 1934 and Representative Doug Holder (R-70) is sponsoring House Joint Resolution 1155. See the Florida VFW Action Corps Alert 5 below and take action today.

FLVFW Action Corps Alert #5

Issue: Ad Valorem Property Tax Relief for Florida’s active duty service members and veterans.

Background: This week the 2009 Regular Session of the Florida Legislature convenes. Both the Senate and the House of Representatives will consider bills which will grant a 100% Ad Valorem tax exemption to active duty service members and mobilized National Guard members and reservists while they are receiving hostile fire pay or imminent danger pay. Additionally, these bills will expand eligibility for the “Combat Related Disability” Ad Valorem tax.

Why is this important? Many of our mobilized Guard members and reservists often see their income reduced when they serve on active duty, thus, jeopardizing their ability to maintain a mortgage and pay property taxes. The proposed resolution and constitutional amendment eliminates property taxes for those service members who are in combat. In 2006 the people approved a constitutional amendment granting a discount on property taxes to veterans who have one or more combat related disabilities if they were over age 65 and entered service from the State of Florida. Our proposed legislation abolishes the pre-service residency requirement.

Action Needed: Contact your State Representatives and State Senator and tell them that those young men and women in harm’s way fighting the Global War on Terrorism deserve a property tax exemption while in combat. Additionally, our oldest veterans with combat related disabilities should receive a property tax discount. Urge them to support HJR 1155 and S.B. 1934/1550. For a by county listing of the members of the State Senate and the State House of Representatives click on these two sites http://www.flsenate.gov/legislators or http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Representatives/representatives.aspx

If you have any questions, please call Legislative Chairman Lee F. Kichen at 727-319-7483.

Instant Bingo Machine Bills Introduced-When the Florida Legislature authorized “Instant Bingo” it neglected make legal the machines used to dispense “Instant Bingo” cards. We are urging you to contact your state law makers and ask them to support H.B. 1351 and S.B. 1326 which fixes this oversight.

BUCHANAN WORKS TO IMPROVE VETERAN’S HEALTH CARE

Washington, D.C. – Congressman Vern Buchanan (FL-13) has written to Veterans Administration (VA) Secretary Eric Shinseki urging him to work with Congress on legislation to improve health care for veterans by advance funding the VA budget.

“The VA has only received one on-time budget in the past 12 years,” wrote Buchanan. “Unpredictable and inadequate funding of health care for our veterans is simply unacceptable. The solution is to advance fund the VA’s budget, requiring Congress to approve a budget a year ahead of time to ensure a smooth operation of the nation’s largest integrated healthcare system.”

Buchanan has cosponsored the Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and Transparency Act (H.R. 1016) to provide advance appropriations and ensure the 97,000 veterans in Florida’s 13th District receive the best quality health care they have earned and deserve.

“As you know, all too often in the past, funding for the VA has been approved so late in the appropriations process that it has jeopardized the delivery of quality care to our veterans,” wrote Buchanan. “HR 1016 would give the VA enough time to plan how to deliver the most efficient and effective care to an increasing number of veterans with increasingly complex medical conditions.”

Membership Application

To apply for membership please contact our Vice President Andy Hooker at andyhooker1@aol.com. Andy will e-mail you the Sarasota County Veterans Commission membership form.

Sarasota County Veterans Commission By-laws

BYLAWS OF THE
SARASOTA COUNTY VETERANS COMMISSION
SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA

ARTICLE I: ESTABLISHMENT

The Sarasota County Veterans Commission, Inc., (SCVC) was originally organized under the laws of the State of Florida on January 25, 1982 and is a not for profit corporation governed under Chapter 617, Laws of the State Florida.


ARTICLE II: PURPOSES

The purposes of the SCVC are to:

Section 1: represent the Sarasota County veterans organizations, military and patriotic associations and their auxiliaries providing solidarity in communicating the veterans view points and as a means of disseminating information on issues before local, state, and national legislative bodies which affect veterans, active military, reserve and national guard personnel, their families, surviving spouses and orphaned children.

Section 2: plan, cooperate and coordinate with local authorities, government officials, and other interested parties on matters of patriotic commemoration.

Section 3: plan, coordinate and implement any other programs to serve the best interests of the personnel cited in Section 1 of this article and any welfare agencies that support said personnel.

ARTICLE III: TERMS AND USAGE

Section 1: Whenever used in this document, the word “organization” shall be construed to denote a post, chapter, unit, branch or similar component of a larger group of veterans, military or patriotic association.

Section 2: The term “commissioner” shall refer to an elected officer of the SCVC; the term “commission” shall refer to the commissioners and all representatives of member organizations.

Section 3: Historically the terms “chairman” and “chairmen” are not gender specific. The proper way to address a female chairman is “Madam Chairman.”

ARTICLE IV: MEMBERSHIP

Section 1: Membership shall be open to Sarasota County based congressionally chartered Veterans Service Organization (VSO) units, posts, chapters, and their auxiliaries. To be considered for Commission membership an organization must submit a membership application to the Membership Committee and agree to pay the membership dues as stated in Articles IV and V. Current members of the Commission will be grandfathered in as members under Section 1.

Section 2: The representation of the above shall be in two categories:
a. One delegate and one alternate from each represented organization. The President, Chair, Commanders or presiding officers of each member organization shall appoint in writing to the commission one delegate and one alternate. Those so appointed shall serve until replaced on written notice from the appointing authority.
b. Ex-officio members shall include all the Past Presidents of the Commission, the Sarasota County Veterans Service Officer; the Commission may designate the Director of the Sarasota Veterans Center and Director of US Department of Veterans Affairs Sarasota Outpatient Clinic, Director of the Sarasota National Cemetery, Commander, HHB 3rd Battalion 265th Air Defense Artillery, FLARNG, and such others as appropriate.

Section 3: Honorary Members. The Commission may vote to grant Honorary Membership to individuals in recognition of their outstanding service to the Nation, to the State, to Active and Reserve forces, and to veterans. Normally, an individual eligible for regular or auxiliary membership is not eligible for this type of membership. Honorary members pay no dues and have no voting rights.

Section 4: Associate Members. Associate Members are categorized as non-congressionally charted VSOs who have an interest in patriotic, military and/or veterans’ affairs. These organizations will pay no dues and will have no voting rights before the SCVC. However, any associate member may request to make a presentation to the SCVC or ask for consideration requiring a SCVC vote, but only Commission members may move or vote on such matters. Associate Members are:

Military Oriented Organizations: Sarasota based National Guard, Reserve, ROTC, Civil Air Patrol, and JROTC units.

Government Agencies: Sarasota government agencies with veterans, Guard or Reserve personnel or a substantial interest in veterans’ issues.

Industries/Companies. Sarasota County based commercial/private companies with veterans, Guard, or Reserve personnel or a substantial interest in veterans’ issues.

ARTICLE V: DUES

Section 1: Dues for member organizations shall be set annually and published by the Commission. Dues are to be received by the Treasurer no later than December 31st of any given calendar year.

Section 2: Ex-officio members shall be exempt from paying dues.

Section 3: Any organization not paying their dues by the December 31st cut off date will be dropped from the Commission roles but may be reinstated upon payment of dues.

ARTICLE VI: MEETINGS

Section 1: The regular meetings of the Commission shall be held at a time and place designated by the Commission President. The meetings of the Commission shall be open to veterans, their families and the public.

Section 2: The Commission shall meet at least once monthly, 12 months of the year, unless extenuating circumstances make this infeasible.

Section 3: The President may call special meetings whenever deemed necessary or when requested to do so by the membership. The purpose of any such meeting shall be stated by the President and announced by mail, electronic means, or by telephone sufficiently in advance of any such meeting to give members time to react.

Section 4: Executive sessions by the Commissioners are strictly prohibited unless the subject matter is so sensitive or of a highly personal nature wherein the membership should not be involved.

Section 5: All meetings will be conducted using the latest Robert’s Rules of Order, which shall govern this Commission in all applicable cases.

Section 6: The President shall preside at all regular and special meetings. In the absence of the President, the Vice President shall preside. In the absence of the President and Vice President, the Secretary then the Treasurer shall preside.
Section 7: All SCVC meetings will be smoke free regardless of the facility in which the meeting is held.

ARTICLE VII: VOTING RIGHTS

Section 1: Commissioners have one vote each on any item; the President may vote only in the case of a tie.

Section 2: Member organizations will have one vote each, to be cast by the primary or alternate member. If both the primary and alternate are present, the “one organization one vote” rule still applies.

Section 3. Ex-officio members will have one vote.

Section 4: Any member of any organization cited in Article II, and the public in general, are both welcome and encouraged to attend meetings. Anyone may give a presentation to the Commission for their cause, however, only members of the Commission may make motions for any action and only Commission members may vote on any motion before the Commission.

Section 5: The Secretary will maintain a roster of all registered organizations and their appointed voting representatives and may be called upon during any meeting to verify the credentials of any person casting a vote.

Section 6: Proxy voting will not be allowed. Each person present shall cast only one vote, e.g. one individual may not represent multiple organizations or cast multiple votes.

Section 7: Liaison officers from other county veteran’s commissions or counsels will not be eligible to vote.

Section 8: A simple majority of 51% or more is sufficient to pass any proposal with the exception of the changes to the Bylaws, which will require a two-thirds majority vote of members present. (Refer to Article XII, Section 2).


ARTICLE VIII: OFFICERS AND DUTIES

Section 1: The elected officers of the Commission shall consist of the President, Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer, and shall perform their duties as prescribed by these bylaws or as directed by the membership. The President may appoint at his discretion a Sergeant-At-Arms and a Chaplain and other positions as deemed appropriate (e.g. SCVC Newsletter Editor, SCVC Web Master).

Section 2: The duties of the President are to:
a. Act as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Commission, and as an ex-officio member of all committees except the Nominations Committee.
b. Appoint chairmen of standing and special committees.
c. Make a decision pending approval of the membership in case of doubt as to the duties and responsibilities of any officer or committee chairman.
d. Appoint a replacement to fulfill the duties of any elected official for anyone who might resign or become unable to fulfill their duties. This appointment must be verified or rejected by the membership at the second regularly scheduled meeting after the appointment is made. See Article X, Section 9.
e. Preside at all meetings and assure that the Commission operates within the parameters established in these bylaws.
f. Set goals and objectives for the Commission, including but not limited to membership, programs, financial matters, and communication with the membership and public.
g. Oversee and manage the Commission's Internet presence, member e-mail lists, and newsletter.
h. Maintain liaison with other veterans’ organizations in the area and other organizations impacting upon the Commission.
i. Represent the Commission at Veteran’s Day services, Memorial Day ceremonies, and any other appropriate commemorative occasion.
j. Present awards and citations
k. Participate in the observance of the death of a member, such as a visitation at a wake or attendance at the funeral, as may be appropriate.
l. Act as final arbiter for all interpretations of the meaning/intent of these bylaws.
m. Undertake other duties as the position of President may require or as voted upon by the membership.

Section 3: The duties of the Vice President are to:
a. Fill the vacancy of the office of the President, should the President become incapacitated, until the next regular election of officers of the Commission.
b. Assume the duties of the President at any function wherein the President is unable to attend.
c. Attend all Commission meetings.
d. Attend any special events in the absence of the President.
e. Undertake additional activities as assigned by the President.

Section 4: The duties of the Secretary are to:
a. Record, prepare, and submit minutes of all meetings for correction, deletions, additions, and approval by the Commission.
b. Maintain official Commission files, to include approved minutes, the Commission’s newsletters, presidential and secretarial correspondence, and memorial records.
c. Conduct a roll call or monitor a sign-in sheet of delegates and organizations at each meeting.
d. Maintain an up-to-date list of organizations, delegates and alternates as certified by the member organizations.
e. Originate correspondence for the Commission.
f. Act as custodian of the Commission’s Bylaws.
g. Ensure that copies of all correspondence, records, minutes, etc., are maintained in the official file of the Sarasota County Veterans’ Commission office, and will ensure that adequate measures are taken to protect those historical documents.

Section 5: The duties of the Treasurer are to:
a. Establish and maintain a checking and/or savings account in a recognized, insured banking facility acceptable to the Commission.
b. Maintain records of all receipts, deposits, and expenditures.
c. Collect dues from member organizations.
d. Submit a written report monthly of the financial status to the Commission.
e. Participate in an annual audit of the accounting system, which will be completed within 30 days of the end of the fiscal year. The fiscal year will run from October 1 to September 30.
f. Disperse funds only by check with authorization by vouchers signed by the President or Vice President or as authorized in the minutes of meetings.
g. Notify the Secretary in the case that any organization is in arrears in the payment of their annual dues.
h. Allow the President to expend up to $50.00 without prior approval for necessary incidental expenses of the Commission. The President will provide the Treasurer with back-up documentation in the way of receipts, etc.

Section 6: The duties of the Commission Sergeant-At-Arms are to:
a. Be responsible for the security at all scheduled monthly meetings of the Commission.
b. Be responsible for the security at all candidate forums and special meetings called by the President.
c. Appoint, as needed, additional Sergeants-At-Arms to fulfill the duties of the Sergeant-At-Arms’ office.
d. Be the Chair of the Security Committee, which may be called together at the discretion of the President or Sergeant-At-Arms. The Committee will be made up of all appointed Sergeants-At-Arms and other members as deemed appropriate by the Sergeant-At-Arms
e. Establish, as needed, a Color/Honor Guard.

Section 7: The duties of the Commission Chaplain are to:
a. Give the prayer at all scheduled monthly meetings of the Commission
b. Give the prayer at all candidate forums and special meetings called by the President.
c. Be available to represent the Commission by giving the prayer at special occasions, as needed.
d. Keep the President informed of illnesses of members of the Commission.

Section 8: Any elected or appointed officer failing to attend three consecutive Commission meetings shall be removed automatically from office unless the absences are excused and acceptable to the Commission. Insofar as is reasonably possible, elected and appointed officers are encouraged to notify the President in advance of any planned absence.

ARTICLE IX: COMMITTEES

Section 1: The Standing Committees of the Commission shall be the Audit Committee, Bylaws Committee, Patriotic Observance Committee, Nominating Committee, and Membership Committee. The President may appoint special committees as required, such as the Veteran of the Year, special events, investigations, assistance in preparing position statements, etc., as deemed appropriate.

Section 2: The President will serve as an ex-officio member of all committees except the Nominations Committee. Committee Chairmen shall have the authority to appoint additional members to their committees as required.

Section 3: The Audit Committee shall make an annual audit of all financial records. Upon approval by the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee shall submit its report, with its findings and any recommendations, in writing, to the Commission for final approval. The report will be given at the first Commission meeting after the conclusion of the audit.

Section 4: The Bylaws Committee will meet at least once annually during the first quarter of each calendar year. The committee will review the Bylaws and recommend any changes. Such changes will be published at least 30 days prior to any meeting where the acceptance of any Bylaws changes is to occur. (Refer to Article XII, Section 1, for details).

Section 5: The nominations Committee will meet in May of each calendar year and prepare for the nominations process in June. (Refer to Article X for details).

Section 6: The Membership Committee will meet at least annually or when an application for membership is received. The Committee is responsible for membership recruitment and retention. Organizations wishing to become a member of the Commission will submit a completed and signed application to the Membership Committee. A copy of the organizations by-laws, charter, mission statement and 501(c) documentation status or other incorporation documentation with the Division of Corporations of the State of Florida will accompany the application. Upon submission the Membership Committee will review the application in detail. After review the Membership Committee will report to the Commission at its next scheduled general meeting with a recommendation to approve or disapprove the application for membership. A motion will be made by a Commission member in good standing and seconded to accept or reject the Membership Committee recommendation. The Commission will then vote on the application. The vote of the Commission is final.

ARTICLE X: NOMINATIONS AND ELECTIONS

Section 1: The Nominations Committee will consist of at least three members, none of whom may be elected Commissioners. Anyone may recommend a nominee to the Nominations
Committee. At the July meeting, the slate of nominees will be announced and any further nominations may be accepted from the floor. The floor nominated nominee may be accepted. At this point nominations will close.

Section 2: A candidate must be a member in good standing in their parent organization, and that organization must be a member in good standing of the Commission.

Section 3: A candidate must be present and accept the nomination or have submitted a letter of acceptance in advance for the office at the time of nomination.

Section 4: No person may hold more than one elective office in the Commission at the same time, however, only if necessary and upon approval of the Commission, the offices of Secretary and Treasurer may be combined, but this is discouraged.

Section 5: The annual election of officers shall be held in September of each year, with a term of office beginning on October 1 and continuing until their successors are elected.

Section 6: All voting for officers shall be by secret ballot. Absentee voting is prohibited. However, in the event that all elected officers have agreed to serve for another term, if this is agreeable with the Nominations Committee, and there are no nominees to vie for any office, then a motion may be entertained for an election by acclamation, which will be duly recorded by the Secretary.

Section 7: The Nominations Committee Chairman will preside over the conduct of any election. The Secretary will verify the qualifications of all delegates and alternates who are to cast a vote.

Section 8: There are no term limits for elected officers. As long as an officer is willing, able, and indeed carrying out the duties of their office in an exemplary manner, then the Commission should give serious consideration for allowing them to continue.

Section 9: A vacancy in any elected office, except for the office of the President, may be temporarily filled by appointment by the President. At the next Commission meeting, the Commission may entertain nominations for the vacated position with an election at the following meeting. No one is to be nominated and elected at the same meeting. The person elected will serve for the remainder of the term to which the vacated officer was initially elected.

Section 10: Note the time between the nomination of officers and election as cited in Sections 5 and 9 of this Article. This is to allow each nominee time to meet with the Commission delegates, prepare a resume, and otherwise make their qualifications and positions known to the voting Commission members.

ARTICLE XI: POLITICAL ACTIVITIES

Section 1: The officers, delegates, and alternates of the Commission are prohibited from using this Commission or its name on behalf of any political party or candidate. The Commission will aggressively maintain a position of non-partisanship in all of its dealings.

Section 2: Candidates seeking political office may not distribute campaign literature, posters, signs, hats, shirts, etc., at any Commission meeting.

Section 3: Persons holding elected office are encouraged to address the Commission concerning matters of interest to the veterans/military community and the Commission. However, their appearance cannot be in conjunction with any reelection effort, and their appearance will in no way constitute a political endorsement of them or their positions by the Commission.

Section 4: During election years, the Commission may conduct candidate forums wherein all candidates for a given office are offered the opportunity to be present and engage in presentations and/or debates. Herein political activities will be allowed outside of the forum building, but must not in any way disrupt the orderly and dignified participation by the candidates.

Section 5: These Bylaws do not prevent the Commission from supporting or endorsing, or stating opposition to, any local, county, state, and federal legislation or actions that would have an impact upon the interests of the Commission.

ARTICLE XII: EFFECTIVE DATE AND AMENDMENTS

Section 1: These Bylaws may be amended or revised only after having been considered by the Bylaws Committee. Any proposed change(s) must be submitted to the Bylaws Committee, whose members will give the recommendations(s) due consideration. The Committee will then make their recommendation(s) known and such recommendation(s) will be published at least 30 days prior to any meeting when a vote of acceptance or rejection is to be held.

Section 2: At the voting meeting, the Bylaws Committee Chairman will preside over the Bylaws portion of the meeting. The recommendation(s) will be read, discussion will be called for, and a vote taken after the Secretary has verified the qualifications of the persons to cast a vote. A vote to change the Bylaws must be by a two-thirds majority of the members present when the vote is taken.

Section 3: These Bylaws are hereby approved and accepted this 18th day of August, 2008.

Signed by:

Dr. Richard M. Swier, President
Andrew Hooker, Vice President
Gen Fowler, Secretary-Treasurer